Managing God’s Money: What Changes When We Stop Thinking Like Owners?
ST. CROIX INSIGHTS
Managing God’s Money: What Changes When We Stop Thinking Like Owners?
“The earth is the LORD’s, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it.” Psalm 24:1
Most financial planning begins with some version of the same question: What do you want your money to do for you?
It’s a reasonable question. We need money to provide for our families, prepare for retirement, weather the unexpected, enjoy life, support people and causes we care about, and eventually leave something behind. Much of my work with clients involves helping them make thoughtful decisions around those very things.
But what happens if the money you’re working with, isn’t actually yours at all? I mean, you’ve earned it. You’ve worked hard for it. But is it solely yours? After all, we came into the world with nothing and we’ll leave with nothing.
Randy Alcorn’s book Managing God’s Money: A Biblical Guide is one I’ve read multiple times. It is one of the most thorough biblical treatments of stewardship I’ve come across. These aren’t just good ideas. They’re the framework I often use to help clients think about money, legacy, and what really lasts. Focusing on what lasts has been on my mind and heart as I’ve walked through this journey of life more.
If we believe what Scripture says, the money we call ours was never entirely ours in the first place. God owns it. We have simply been entrusted with managing it for a period of time. I know at many times I’ve thought it was all mine, but when you start thinking about it deeply, you realize it’s not.
That sounds like a theological distinction until you begin applying it to actual financial decisions. Then it becomes very practical, very quickly.
From Ownership to Stewardship
Imagine you were responsible for managing the financial resources of a business you didn’t own. You would probably approach every decision differently than you would if you believed the money was yours to do with as you pleased.
You would want to know what the owner expected. You would consider whether a decision supported the owner’s goals. You would think about your responsibility to use the resources wisely, and you would expect to eventually account for what you had done with them.
That is essentially the picture of stewardship Alcorn develops throughout the book.
For Christians, this changes the question from, “What can I afford?” to something closer to, “What is the wisest and most faithful use of what has been entrusted to me?” How would Jesus direct us to use these treasures we’ve been entrusted with?
That distinction matters because affordability alone is a surprisingly low bar for making financial decisions.
A family may be able to afford the larger house, another vehicle, or a more expensive lifestyle. A retiree may have accumulated considerably more than he or she is likely to spend. Parents may be financially capable of leaving a substantial inheritance to their children. I think many times the fall back is to increase our lifestyles. I get it.
None of those things are inherently wrong. The better question is whether they reflect what we actually want our resources to accomplish.
This is one reason I believe faith belongs in the financial planning conversation for clients who want it there. A financial plan shouldn’t merely tell you what you can do. It should help you think carefully about what you believe you should do.
How Much Is Enough?
One of the more difficult questions in financial planning is also one of the simplest: How much is enough?
There is no universal dollar amount. This truly isn’t an easy answer and everyone has a different number.
For one family, a certain level of spending may represent a meaningful life built around family, hospitality, travel, and experiences they have intentionally chosen. For another, the same spending may simply reflect a lifestyle that expanded every time income did. For some, giving/tithing is placed at the front of line before anything else.
The same is true of saving. Preparing for retirement is wise. Maintaining appropriate reserves is wise. Investing for future needs is wise. Yet there is a point at which preparation for the future can quietly turn into accumulation without a defined purpose.
That distinction is important because “more” has no natural stopping point.
If our goal is simply to accumulate, there will always be another milestone. We can move from wanting $1 million to $2 million, then from $2 million to $3 million, without ever stopping to ask what the additional money is actually for.
A good financial plan should help answer that question.
Once we have identified what is needed to provide for our family, prepare for reasonable contingencies and accomplish the things we believe we are called to do, we can begin asking a much more interesting question: What could the rest accomplish?
That is where financial planning and generosity should begin to intersect.
“I’ll Give More When I Have More”
I have heard variations of this idea many times: Someday, when there is more money, there will be more room to give.
It sounds reasonable. The problem is that “someday” has a habit of moving.
As income increases, lifestyles often expand with it. A larger paycheck makes room for a nicer house, better vacations, another vehicle, or simply more convenience. None of those things necessarily represent poor stewardship, but without intentionality, additional income can be absorbed long before generosity ever gets a chance at it.
Alcorn’s discussion of the poor widow who gave two small coins (Mark 12:41–44) and the rich man who kept building bigger barns to hold all of his crop (Luke 12:16–21) offers an uncomfortable contrast. Generosity isn’t primarily a question of the amount given. It reveals something about our willingness to loosen our grip on what we have.
That means the best time to establish generosity as part of a financial plan usually isn’t after reaching some future level of wealth. It’s now.
For someone who has never developed a regular giving practice, tithing can provide a concrete place to begin. I like Alcorn’s description of it as training wheels. Ten percent isn’t necessarily the finish line; it can be the structure that helps us develop the habit of giving intentionally rather than waiting to see what happens to be left over.
What’s interesting about the statement, I’ll give more when I have more or have built more up, is what happens when you start thinking about all the lives you could have impacted over one, five, 10, or even 30 years had you started sooner. It’s much easier to give money away upon our deaths, when we no longer have a personal use for it, but what about the impact we could make while we’re still here? Many times, I sit back and think about the people and places my family is impacting today because we chose not to wait. I’m a big believer that I can’t take clients where I haven’t gone myself.
Money Is a Tool, Not the Enemy
There is another side to this conversation that matters.
A biblical approach to money does not require us to feel guilty for earning it, saving it, investing it, or enjoying it.
Money itself isn’t the problem. What matters is the place it occupies in our lives.
I sometimes put it this way with clients: It isn’t wrong to have money. The question is whether money has you.
Financial planning can actually help create freedom here. When we understand what we have, what we need and what our resources can reasonably support, we may be better equipped to hold money loosely rather than living in constant fear of losing it.
That matters during volatile markets, too.
Diversification, appropriate asset allocation, and long-term planning are important. We should make wise financial decisions. But no investment strategy can eliminate uncertainty from life, and a portfolio was never meant to carry the full weight of our security.
For Christians, our financial security and our ultimate security are not the same thing.
Invest in What Has Lasting Value
Financial planners spend a lot of time asking people to think long term.
Don’t react to today’s market. Think about retirement. Consider where you’ll be 10, 20, or 30 years from now.
Alcorn stretches that timeline considerably further.
If we genuinely believe earthly life is temporary and eternity is not, then even a 30-year financial projection is a relatively short-term view. That perspective doesn’t make retirement planning, investing, or estate planning irrelevant. It gives them context.
It asks us to consider whether we’re putting all of our effort into building something that ultimately has an expiration date.
Homes eventually belong to someone else. Cars wear out. Investment accounts are transferred. The possessions we spent decades acquiring are eventually sold, donated, inherited, or thrown away. Earthly possessions are not really ours anyways.
That leads to one very big question: When everything we own eventually ends up broken, abandoned, or in a junkyard somewhere, what will we have done with our lives that lasts?
That’s a worthwhile estate planning question.
It’s also a worthwhile question at 40, 50 or 60, while there is still plenty of life left to live and plenty of opportunity to decide what our resources will accomplish.
A Different Definition of a Successful Financial Plan
We often measure financial success by numbers: net worth, investment returns, retirement income, tax savings, or the size of an estate.
Those measurements have their place. I want clients to make sound financial decisions, and I want the plans we build to work.
But Managing God’s Money is a reminder that, for a Christian, a technically successful financial plan can still miss the larger objective.
The ultimate goal isn’t to arrive at the end of life having accumulated the most.
It’s to have been faithful with what was entrusted to us.
That may mean providing well for a family. It may mean enjoying some of the resources God has given us with gratitude. It may mean helping children while also teaching them responsibility. It may mean supporting a church, funding ministry, helping someone through a difficult season, giving generously to organizations doing meaningful work, or deciding that we already have enough and someone else needs the next dollar more than we do.
The specifics will look different for every family.
The underlying question remains the same: Am I living as though this is my money, or am I managing it as something God has entrusted to my care?
Once that question changes, a surprising number of financial decisions begin to look different.
Perhaps that’s the real value of stewardship-based financial planning. It doesn’t simply help us accumulate resources and eventually distribute them. It helps us decide, while we still have the opportunity, what we want those resources to accomplish.
Because in the end, the measure we are seeking isn’t “well accumulated.”
It’s “well done.”
“The earth is the LORD’s, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it.” Psalm 24:1
Most financial planning begins with some version of the same question: What do you want your money to do for you?
It’s a reasonable question. We need money to provide for our families, prepare for retirement, weather the unexpected, enjoy life, support people and causes we care about, and eventually leave something behind. Much of my work with clients involves helping them make thoughtful decisions around those very things.
But what happens if the money you’re working with, isn’t actually yours at all? I mean, you’ve earned it. You’ve worked hard for it. But is it solely yours? After all, we came into the world with nothing and we’ll leave with nothing.
Randy Alcorn’s book Managing God’s Money: A Biblical Guide is one I’ve read multiple times. It is one of the most thorough biblical treatments of stewardship I’ve come across. These aren’t just good ideas. They’re the framework I often use to help clients think about money, legacy, and what really lasts. Focusing on what lasts has been on my mind and heart as I’ve walked through this journey of life more.
If we believe what Scripture says, the money we call ours was never entirely ours in the first place. God owns it. We have simply been entrusted with managing it for a period of time. I know at many times I’ve thought it was all mine, but when you start thinking about it deeply, you realize it’s not.
That sounds like a theological distinction until you begin applying it to actual financial decisions. Then it becomes very practical, very quickly.
From Ownership to Stewardship
Imagine you were responsible for managing the financial resources of a business you didn’t own. You would probably approach every decision differently than you would if you believed the money was yours to do with as you pleased.
You would want to know what the owner expected. You would consider whether a decision supported the owner’s goals. You would think about your responsibility to use the resources wisely, and you would expect to eventually account for what you had done with them.
That is essentially the picture of stewardship Alcorn develops throughout the book.
For Christians, this changes the question from, “What can I afford?” to something closer to, “What is the wisest and most faithful use of what has been entrusted to me?” How would Jesus direct us to use these treasures we’ve been entrusted with?
That distinction matters because affordability alone is a surprisingly low bar for making financial decisions.
A family may be able to afford the larger house, another vehicle, or a more expensive lifestyle. A retiree may have accumulated considerably more than he or she is likely to spend. Parents may be financially capable of leaving a substantial inheritance to their children. I think many times the fall back is to increase our lifestyles. I get it.
None of those things are inherently wrong. The better question is whether they reflect what we actually want our resources to accomplish.
This is one reason I believe faith belongs in the financial planning conversation for clients who want it there. A financial plan shouldn’t merely tell you what you can do. It should help you think carefully about what you believe you should do.
How Much Is Enough?
One of the more difficult questions in financial planning is also one of the simplest: How much is enough?
There is no universal dollar amount. This truly isn’t an easy answer and everyone has a different number.
For one family, a certain level of spending may represent a meaningful life built around family, hospitality, travel, and experiences they have intentionally chosen. For another, the same spending may simply reflect a lifestyle that expanded every time income did. For some, giving/tithing is placed at the front of line before anything else.
The same is true of saving. Preparing for retirement is wise. Maintaining appropriate reserves is wise. Investing for future needs is wise. Yet there is a point at which preparation for the future can quietly turn into accumulation without a defined purpose.
That distinction is important because “more” has no natural stopping point.
If our goal is simply to accumulate, there will always be another milestone. We can move from wanting $1 million to $2 million, then from $2 million to $3 million, without ever stopping to ask what the additional money is actually for.
A good financial plan should help answer that question.
Once we have identified what is needed to provide for our family, prepare for reasonable contingencies and accomplish the things we believe we are called to do, we can begin asking a much more interesting question: What could the rest accomplish?
That is where financial planning and generosity should begin to intersect.
“I’ll Give More When I Have More”
I have heard variations of this idea many times: Someday, when there is more money, there will be more room to give.
It sounds reasonable. The problem is that “someday” has a habit of moving.
As income increases, lifestyles often expand with it. A larger paycheck makes room for a nicer house, better vacations, another vehicle, or simply more convenience. None of those things necessarily represent poor stewardship, but without intentionality, additional income can be absorbed long before generosity ever gets a chance at it.
Alcorn’s discussion of the poor widow who gave two small coins (Mark 12:41–44) and the rich man who kept building bigger barns to hold all of his crop (Luke 12:16–21) offers an uncomfortable contrast. Generosity isn’t primarily a question of the amount given. It reveals something about our willingness to loosen our grip on what we have.
That means the best time to establish generosity as part of a financial plan usually isn’t after reaching some future level of wealth. It’s now.
For someone who has never developed a regular giving practice, tithing can provide a concrete place to begin. I like Alcorn’s description of it as training wheels. Ten percent isn’t necessarily the finish line; it can be the structure that helps us develop the habit of giving intentionally rather than waiting to see what happens to be left over.
What’s interesting about the statement, I’ll give more when I have more or have built more up, is what happens when you start thinking about all the lives you could have impacted over one, five, 10, or even 30 years had you started sooner. It’s much easier to give money away upon our deaths, when we no longer have a personal use for it, but what about the impact we could make while we’re still here? Many times, I sit back and think about the people and places my family is impacting today because we chose not to wait. I’m a big believer that I can’t take clients where I haven’t gone myself.
Money Is a Tool, Not the Enemy
There is another side to this conversation that matters.
A biblical approach to money does not require us to feel guilty for earning it, saving it, investing it, or enjoying it.
Money itself isn’t the problem. What matters is the place it occupies in our lives.
I sometimes put it this way with clients: It isn’t wrong to have money. The question is whether money has you.
Financial planning can actually help create freedom here. When we understand what we have, what we need and what our resources can reasonably support, we may be better equipped to hold money loosely rather than living in constant fear of losing it.
That matters during volatile markets, too.
Diversification, appropriate asset allocation, and long-term planning are important. We should make wise financial decisions. But no investment strategy can eliminate uncertainty from life, and a portfolio was never meant to carry the full weight of our security.
For Christians, our financial security and our ultimate security are not the same thing.
Invest in What Has Lasting Value
Financial planners spend a lot of time asking people to think long term.
Don’t react to today’s market. Think about retirement. Consider where you’ll be 10, 20, or 30 years from now.
Alcorn stretches that timeline considerably further.
If we genuinely believe earthly life is temporary and eternity is not, then even a 30-year financial projection is a relatively short-term view. That perspective doesn’t make retirement planning, investing, or estate planning irrelevant. It gives them context.
It asks us to consider whether we’re putting all of our effort into building something that ultimately has an expiration date.
Homes eventually belong to someone else. Cars wear out. Investment accounts are transferred. The possessions we spent decades acquiring are eventually sold, donated, inherited, or thrown away. Earthly possessions are not really ours anyways.
That leads to one very big question: When everything we own eventually ends up broken, abandoned, or in a junkyard somewhere, what will we have done with our lives that lasts?
That’s a worthwhile estate planning question.
It’s also a worthwhile question at 40, 50 or 60, while there is still plenty of life left to live and plenty of opportunity to decide what our resources will accomplish.
A Different Definition of a Successful Financial Plan
We often measure financial success by numbers: net worth, investment returns, retirement income, tax savings, or the size of an estate.
Those measurements have their place. I want clients to make sound financial decisions, and I want the plans we build to work.
But Managing God’s Money is a reminder that, for a Christian, a technically successful financial plan can still miss the larger objective.
The ultimate goal isn’t to arrive at the end of life having accumulated the most.
It’s to have been faithful with what was entrusted to us.
That may mean providing well for a family. It may mean enjoying some of the resources God has given us with gratitude. It may mean helping children while also teaching them responsibility. It may mean supporting a church, funding ministry, helping someone through a difficult season, giving generously to organizations doing meaningful work, or deciding that we already have enough and someone else needs the next dollar more than we do.
The specifics will look different for every family.
The underlying question remains the same: Am I living as though this is my money, or am I managing it as something God has entrusted to my care?
Once that question changes, a surprising number of financial decisions begin to look different.
Perhaps that’s the real value of stewardship-based financial planning. It doesn’t simply help us accumulate resources and eventually distribute them. It helps us decide, while we still have the opportunity, what we want those resources to accomplish.
Because in the end, the measure we are seeking isn’t “well accumulated.”
It’s “well done.”





